linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/11] ARM: defconfig: Remove CONFIG_MISC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOMZO5DwwxFz30hHVyUWPBwEzCD+qcoxE6ef3t758MHd72JdKw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:39:59 -0300
From:	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] ARM: defconfig: Remove CONFIG_MISC_DEVICES

Hi Arnd,

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:

> Sorry for not replying earlier. We could merge these through the
> arm-soc tree, but I'm not actually sure if they are necessary.
>
> For all I know, listing a nonexisting configuration option in
> a defconfig file has no effect, and the files get recreated
> whenever the maintainers choose to.

My intention with this series is merely to provide a cleanup in the
defconfigs, so that they do not include an non-existing configuration.
I know it is not harmful to let the CONFIG_MISC_DEVICES there, but
after my commit 7c5763 I think we should get rid of
CONFIG_MISC_DEVICES completely.

I saw that the ia64 Intel patch from this series was already applied
into mainline and I also got some other Acks from different
architectures.

Regards,

Fabio Estevam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/