[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120921195929.GL7264@google.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:59:29 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, devel@...nvz.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/16] memcg: skip memcg kmem allocations in
specified code regions
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 06:12:01PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> +static void memcg_stop_kmem_account(void)
> +{
> + if (!current->mm)
> + return;
> +
> + current->memcg_kmem_skip_account++;
> +}
> +
> +static void memcg_resume_kmem_account(void)
> +{
> + if (!current->mm)
> + return;
> +
> + current->memcg_kmem_skip_account--;
> +}
I can't say I'm a big fan of this approach. If there are enough
users, maybe but can't we just annotate the affected allocations
explicitly? Is this gonna have many more users?
Also, in general, can we please add some comments? I know memcg code
is dearth of comments but let's please not keep it that way.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists