[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120921200733.GM7264@google.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:07:33 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
devel@...nvz.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/16] sl[au]b: always get the cache from its page
in kfree
Hello,
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:41:52PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > I am already using static keys extensively in this patchset, and that is
> > how I intend to handle this particular case.
>
> Cool.
>
> The key point here is that !CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM should have exactly *zero*
> performance impact and CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM disabled at runtime should have
> absolute minimal impact.
Not necessarily disagreeing, but I don't think it's helpful to set the
bar impossibly high. Even static_key doesn't have "exactly *zero*"
impact. Let's stick to as minimal as possible when not in use and
reasonable in use.
And, yeah, this one can be easily solved by using static_key.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists