[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120922133847.GC20003@linux-mips.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 15:38:47 +0200
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: sys_kcmp (was: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: add finit_module syscall to
ARM)
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 02:20:46PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> 2. There allegedly exists a patch to remove x86isms from sys_kcmp -
> allegedly also in akpm's tree. However, I've looked through the code in
> mainline, and nothing stands out. Ralf Beachle also said yesterday that
> he has looked through from the MIPS PoV and also can't see any x86isms,
> so we're both thinking that it should merely have the x86 dependency
> removed.
>
> 3. Until the x86 dependency is gone (that depends on what akpm proposes to
> do with the patches he's allegedly sitting on), non-x86 arches can only
> reserve the syscall, and add an IGNORE for it.
There is a weak definition provided in kernel/sys_ni.c so it actually can
be properly wired up in preparation for the day when the dependency in
Kconfig gets fixed.
> It would be good to at least get checksyscalls.sh fixed so arch maintainers
> get their warnings for new syscalls back.
Indeed. That script has become just too important.
Ralf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists