[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <506048D1.70403@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:49:37 +0800
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
CC: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] KVM: MMU: fix release noslot pfn
On 09/24/2012 07:24 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:59:32PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> On 09/23/2012 05:13 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 02:57:19PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>>> We can not directly call kvm_release_pfn_clean to release the pfn
>>>> since we can meet noslot pfn which is used to cache mmio info into
>>>> spte
>>>>
>>> Wouldn't it be better to move the check into kvm_release_pfn_clean()?
>>
>> I think there is no reason for us to prefer to adding this branch in
>> the common code. :)
>
> Is the function performance critical? Is function called without the check
> on a hot path? The function already contains much heavier kvm_is_mmio_pfn()
> check. If most/all function invocation require check before call it's
> better to move it inside.
It is not most/all functions need do this check - it is only needed on x86 mmu
page-fault/prefetch path.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists