[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120924.145014.1452596970914043018.hdoyu@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 13:50:14 +0200
From: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>
To: "m.szyprowski@...sung.com" <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
CC: "James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com"
<James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
"swarren@...dotorg.org" <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
"joerg.roedel@....com" <joerg.roedel@....com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>, Krishna Reddy <vdumpa@...dia.com>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"minchan@...nel.org" <minchan@...nel.org>,
"chunsang.jeong@...aro.org" <chunsang.jeong@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"subashrp@...il.com" <subashrp@...il.com>,
"linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"kyungmin.park@...sung.com" <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
"pullip.cho@...sung.com" <pullip.cho@...sung.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: How to specify IOMMU'able devices in DT
Hi Marek,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com> wrote @ Mon, 24 Sep 2012 13:14:51 +0200:
> Hello,
>
> On Monday, September 24, 2012 11:45 AM Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:28:01 +0200
> > James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 12:04 +0300, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
> > > > index a1a7225..9eae3be 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/base/platform.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
> > > > @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
> > > > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > > > #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> > > >
> > > > +#include <asm/dma-iommu.h>
> > > > +
> > > > #include "base.h"
> > > >
> > > > #define to_platform_driver(drv) (container_of((drv), struct
> > > > platform_driver, \
> > > > @@ -305,8 +307,19 @@ int platform_device_add(struct platform_device
> > > > *pdev)
> > > > dev_name(&pdev->dev), dev_name(pdev->dev.parent));
> > > >
> > > > ret = device_add(&pdev->dev);
> > > > - if (ret == 0)
> > > > - return ret;
> > > > + if (ret)
> > > > + goto failed;
> > > > +
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PLATFORM_ENABLE_IOMMU
> > > > + if (platform_bus_type.map && !pdev->dev.archdata.mapping) {
> > > > + ret = arm_iommu_attach_device(&pdev->dev,
> > > > + platform_bus_type.map);
> > > > + if (ret)
> > > > + goto failed;
> > >
> > > This is horrible ... you're adding an architecture specific callback
> > > into our generic code; that's really a no-no. If the concept of
> > > CONFIG_PLATFORM_ENABE_IOMMU is useful to more than just arm, then this
> > > could become a generic callback.
> >
> > As mentioned in the original, this is a heck to explain what is
> > needed. I am looking for some generic solution for how to specify
> > IOMMU info for each platform devices. I'm guessing that some other SoC
> > may have the similar requirements on the above. As you mentioned, this
> > solution should be a generic, not arch specific.
>
> Please read more about bus notifiers. IMHO a good example is provided in
> the following thread:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg12238.html
This bus notifier seems enough flexible to afford the variation of
IOMMU map info, like Tegra ASID, which could be platform-specific, and
the other could be common too. There's already iommu_bus_notifier
too. I'll try to implement something base on this.
Thanks for the good info.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists