[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <xa1t1uhrcvth.fsf@mina86.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 16:57:46 +0200
From: Michal Nazarewicz <mpn@...gle.com>
To: George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...izon.com, rabin@....in
Cc: hughd@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
vda.linux@...glemail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] lib: vsprintf: Optimize put_dec_trunc8
On Mon, Sep 24 2012, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> Ah, right. I also thought about that first but than started worrying
> that it could produce unnecessary zeros if the loop iterates at least
> once and exits with r being zero, but now I see that this cannot happen
> since if the loop condition was true, r >= 10000 and it has been divided
> by 10000 in the loop so now it's at least 1.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I of course meant “10” and “at least 1000”.
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +----<email/xmpp: mpn@...gle.com>--------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists