lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1348508657.11847.114.camel@twins>
Date:	Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:44:17 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Nikolay Ulyanitsky <lystor@...il.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Subject: Re: 20% performance drop on PostgreSQL 9.2 from kernel 3.5.3 to
 3.6-rc5 on AMD chipsets - bisected

On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 18:54 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> But let me try and come up with the list thing, I think we've
> actually got that someplace as well. 

OK, I'm sure the below can be written better, but my brain is gone for
the day...

---
 include/linux/sched.h |   1 +
 kernel/sched/core.c   |   1 +
 kernel/sched/fair.c   | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 0beac68..d72ea68 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -888,6 +888,7 @@ struct sched_group {
 	atomic_t ref;
 
 	unsigned int group_weight;
+	int group_first;
 	struct sched_group_power *sgp;
 
 	/*
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index b38f00e..1177eb1 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -5781,6 +5781,7 @@ static void init_sched_groups_power(int cpu, struct sched_domain *sd)
 
 	do {
 		sg->group_weight = cpumask_weight(sched_group_cpus(sg));
+		sg->group_first = cpumask_first(sched_group_cpus(sg));
 		sg = sg->next;
 	} while (sg != sd->groups);
 
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 6b800a1..601bc38 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -2634,50 +2634,90 @@ find_idlest_cpu(struct sched_group *group, struct task_struct *p, int this_cpu)
  */
 static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int target)
 {
-	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
-	int prev_cpu = task_cpu(p);
-	struct sched_domain *sd;
-	struct sched_group *sg;
-	int i;
+	struct sched_domain *sd_smt, *sd_llc;
+	struct sched_group *sg_smt, *sg_llc;
 
 	/*
-	 * If the task is going to be woken-up on this cpu and if it is
-	 * already idle, then it is the right target.
+	 * Of the target is idle, easy peasy, we're done.
 	 */
-	if (target == cpu && idle_cpu(cpu))
-		return cpu;
+	if (idle_cpu(target))
+		return target;
 
 	/*
-	 * If the task is going to be woken-up on the cpu where it previously
-	 * ran and if it is currently idle, then it the right target.
+	 * Otherwise, see if there's an idle core in the cache domain.
 	 */
-	if (target == prev_cpu && idle_cpu(prev_cpu))
-		return prev_cpu;
+	sd_llc = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc, target));
+	sg_llc = sd_llc->groups;
+	do {
+		int candidate = -1;
+
+		sd_smt = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc, sg_llc->group_first));
+		for_each_lower_domain(sd_smt) {
+			if (sd_smt->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER) /* aka. SMT */
+				break;
+		}
+
+		if (!sd_smt) {
+			int cpu = sg_llc->group_first; /* Assume singleton group */
+
+			if (!idle_cpu(cpu))
+				goto next_llc;
+
+			if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tsk_cpus_allowed(p)))
+				goto next_llc;
+
+			return cpu;
+		}
+
+		sg_smt = sd_smt->groups;
+		do {
+			int cpu = sg_smt->group_first; /* Assume singleton group */
+
+			if (!idle_cpu(cpu)) /* core is not idle, skip to next core */
+				goto next_llc;
+
+			if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tsk_cpus_allowed(p)))
+				goto next_smt;
+
+			if (candidate < 0)
+				candidate = cpu;
+
+next_smt:
+			sg_smt = sg_smt->next;
+		} while (sg_smt != sd_smt->groups);
+
+		if (candidate >= 0)
+			return candidate;
+
+next_llc:
+		sg_llc = sg_llc->next;
+	} while (sg_llc != sd_llc->groups);
 
 	/*
-	 * Otherwise, iterate the domains and find an elegible idle cpu.
+	 * Failing that, see if there's an idle SMT sibling.
 	 */
-	sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc, target));
-	for_each_lower_domain(sd) {
-		sg = sd->groups;
+	sd_smt = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc, target));
+	for_each_lower_domain(sd_smt) {
+		if (sd_smt->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER) /* aka. SMT */
+			break;
+	}
+
+	if (sd_smt) {
+		sg_smt = sd_smt->groups;
 		do {
-			if (!cpumask_intersects(sched_group_cpus(sg),
-						tsk_cpus_allowed(p)))
-				goto next;
+			int cpu = sg_smt->group_first; /* Assume singleton group */
 
-			for_each_cpu(i, sched_group_cpus(sg)) {
-				if (!idle_cpu(i))
-					goto next;
-			}
+			if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tsk_cpus_allowed(p)) &&
+			    idle_cpu(cpu))
+				return cpu;
 
-			target = cpumask_first_and(sched_group_cpus(sg),
-					tsk_cpus_allowed(p));
-			goto done;
-next:
-			sg = sg->next;
-		} while (sg != sd->groups);
+			sg_smt = sg_smt->next;
+		} while (sg_smt != sd_smt->groups);
 	}
-done:
+
+	/*
+	 * OK, no idle siblings of any kind, take what we started with.
+	 */
 	return target;
 }
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ