[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1348511193.6951.44.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:26:33 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Nikolay Ulyanitsky <lystor@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Subject: Re: 20% performance drop on PostgreSQL 9.2 from kernel 3.5.3 to
3.6-rc5 on AMD chipsets - bisected
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 18:54 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 09:30 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Also, do we really want to spread things out that aggressively?
> > How/why do we know that we don't want to share L2 caches, for example?
> > It sounds like a bad idea from a power standpoint, and possibly
> > performance too.
>
> IIRC this current stuff is the result of Mike and Suresh running a few
> benchmarks.. Mike, Suresh, either one of you remember this? Otherwise
> I'll have to go trawl the archives.
Aside from the cache pollution I recall having been mentioned, on my
E5620, cross core is a tbench win over affine, cross thread is not.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists