[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120924181025.GG7694@google.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:10:25 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Deepawali Verma <dverma249@...il.com>
Cc: Chinmay V S <cvs268@...il.com>,
Daniel Taylor <Daniel.Taylor@....com>,
anish singh <anish198519851985@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Work queue questions
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 05:56:10PM +0100, Deepawali Verma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is sample code snippet as I cannot post my project code. In
> reality here, this work handler is copying the big chunks of data that
> code is
> here in my driver. This is running on quad core cortex A9 Thats why I
> asked. If there are 4 cpu cores, then there must be parallelism. Now
> Tajun, what do you say?
My name is Tejun and please lose the frigging attitude when you're
asking things.
> >>> alloc_workqueue(obj[i].my_obj_wq_name,WQ_UNBOUND,1);
Especially if you're not properly reading any of the documentation,
function comment and my explicit response mentioning @max_active. :(
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists