[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120924201650.6574af64.conny.seidel@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:16:50 +0200
From: Conny Seidel <conny.seidel@....com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
CC: <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: divide error: bdi_dirty_limit+0x5a/0x9e
Hi,
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 16:36:09 +0200
Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org> wrote:
>[ … ]
>
>Conny, would you test pls?
Sure thing.
Out of ~25 runs I only triggered it once, without the patch the
trigger-rate is higher.
[ 55.098249] Broke affinity for irq 81
[ 55.105108] smpboot: CPU 1 is now offline
[ 55.311216] smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 1 APIC 0x11
[ 55.333022] LVT offset 0 assigned for vector 0x400
[ 55.545877] smpboot: CPU 2 is now offline
[ 55.753050] smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 2 APIC 0x12
[ 55.775582] LVT offset 0 assigned for vector 0x400
[ 55.986747] smpboot: CPU 3 is now offline
[ 56.193839] smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 3 APIC 0x13
[ 56.212643] LVT offset 0 assigned for vector 0x400
[ 56.423201] Got negative events: -25
The Divide error wasn't triggered with the patch applied.
--
Kind regards.
Conny Seidel
##################################################################
# Email : conny.seidel@....com GnuPG-Key : 0xA6AB055D #
# Fingerprint: 17C4 5DB2 7C4C C1C7 1452 8148 F139 7C09 A6AB 055D #
##################################################################
# Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24 85609 Dornach #
# General Managers: Alberto Bozzo #
# Registration: Dornach, Landkr. Muenchen; Registerger. Muenchen #
# HRB Nr. 43632 #
##################################################################
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists