linux-kernel - Re: sys_kcmp (was: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: add finit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1348510573.20929.44.camel@deneb.redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:16:09 -0400
From:	Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
To:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: sys_kcmp (was: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: add finit_module syscall to
 ARM)

On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 21:42 +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 08:49:42PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > > I got past that with:
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
> > > index 01ef030..14e394d 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/security.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/security.h
> > > @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ void reset_security_ops(void);
> > >  extern unsigned long mmap_min_addr;
> > >  extern unsigned long dac_mmap_min_addr;
> > >  #else
> > > +#define mmap_min_addr          0UL
> > >  #define dac_mmap_min_addr      0UL
> > >  #endif
> > > 
> 
> I think better to add CONFIG_MMU test here.

Well, my patch was just something quick to get the kernel to build, but
thinking about it a bit, I still prefer it. The CONFIG_MMU check is in
security.h already so I think it is less clutter and better for future
code which may use mmap_min_addr. In any case, the compiler will drop
any test for "x < 0UL" so the end result is the same.

> ---
> From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
> Subject: prctl: prctl_set_mm -- Don't test for mmap_min_addr on non-MMU config
> 
> In case if CONFIG_MMU is not set the @mmap_min_addr
> is undefined leading to build error. Thus test for
> it iif CONFIG_MMU is present.
> 
> Note this code snippet depends on CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE=y.
> 
> Reported-by: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
> ---
>  kernel/sys.c |    4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6.git/kernel/sys.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.git.orig/kernel/sys.c
> +++ linux-2.6.git/kernel/sys.c
> @@ -1865,7 +1865,11 @@ static int prctl_set_mm(int opt, unsigne
>  	if (opt == PR_SET_MM_EXE_FILE)
>  		return prctl_set_mm_exe_file(mm, (unsigned int)addr);
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
>  	if (addr >= TASK_SIZE || addr < mmap_min_addr)
> +#else
> +	if (addr >= TASK_SIZE)
> +#endif
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	error = -EINVAL;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/