linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] perf: use hrtimer for event multiplexing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABPqkBTmJMRO6v+RukpYGJFgsGRyRheJe+mCdf9AmmKRbPGbuw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:11:11 +0200
From:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] perf: use hrtimer for event multiplexing

Any comment on this patch set?
This is an important improvement for any system-wide measurement.

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com> wrote:
> The current scheme of using the timer tick was fine
> for per-thread events. However, it was causing
> bias issues in system-wide mode (including for
> uncore PMUs). Event groups would not get their
> fair share of runtime on the PMU. With tickless
> kernels, if a core is idle there is no timer tick,
> and thus no event rotation (multiplexing). However,
> there are events (especially uncore events) which do
> count even though cores are asleep.
>
> This patch changes the timer source for multiplexing.
> It introduces a per-cpu hrtimer. The advantage is that
> even when the core goes idle, it will come back to
> service the hrtimer, thus multiplexing on system-wide
> events works much better.
>
> In order to minimize the impact of the hrtimer, it
> is turned on and off on demand. When the PMU on
> a CPU is overcommited, the hrtimer is activated.
> It is stopped when the PMU is not overcommitted.
>
> In order for this to work properly with HOTPLUG_CPU,
> we had to change the order of initialization in
> start_kernel() such that hrtimer_init() is run
> before perf_event_init().
>
> The second patch provide a sysctl control to
> adjust the multiplexing interval. Unit is
> milliseconds.
>
> Here is a simple before/after example with
> two event groups which do require multiplexing.
> This is done in system-wide mode on an idle
> system. What matters here is the scaling factor
> in [] in not the total counts.
>
> Before:
>
> # perf stat -a -e ref-cycles,ref-cycles sleep 10
>  Performance counter stats for 'sleep 10':
>  34,319,545 ref-cycles  [56.51%]
>  31,917,229 ref-cycles  [43.50%]
>
>  10.000827569 seconds time elapsed
>
> After:
> # perf stat -a -e ref-cycles,ref-cycles sleep 10
>  Performance counter stats for 'sleep 10':
>  11,144,822,193 ref-cycles [50.00%]
>  11,103,760,513 ref-cycles [50.00%]
>
>  10.000672946 seconds time elapsed
>
> In this second version of the patchset, we now
> have the hrtimer_interval per PMU instance. The
> tunable is in /sys/devices/XXX/mux_interval_ms,
> where XXX is the name of the PMU instance. Due
> to initialization changes of each hrtimer, we
> had to introduce hrtimer_init_cpu() to initialize
> a hrtimer from another CPU.
>
> In the 3rd version, we simplify the code a bit
> by using hrtimer_active(). We stopped using
> the rotation_list for perf_cpu_hrtimer_cancel().
> We also fix an intialization problem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
> ---
>
> Stephane Eranian (3):
>   hrtimer: add hrtimer_init_cpu()
>   perf: use hrtimer for event multiplexing
>   perf: add sysfs entry to adjust multiplexing interval per PMU
>
>  include/linux/hrtimer.h    |    2 +
>  include/linux/perf_event.h |    5 +-
>  init/main.c                |    2 +-
>  kernel/events/core.c       |  166 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  kernel/hrtimer.c           |   17 +++--
>  5 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/