| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1348822202.3292.53.camel@twins> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 10:50:02 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, eranian@...gle.com, acme@...hat.com, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/31] perf, x86: Basic Haswell PEBS support On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 21:31 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > + INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x11d0, 0xf), /* MEM_UOPS_RETIRED.STLB_MISS_LOADS */ > + INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x12d0, 0xf), /* MEM_UOPS_RETIRED.STLB_MISS_STORES */ > + INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x21d0, 0xf), /* MEM_UOPS_RETIRED.LOCK_LOADS */ Did you miss umask 22, LOCK_STORES ? (I haven't looked at the SDM yet, just seeing a glitch in the pattern). > + INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x41d0, 0xf), /* MEM_UOPS_RETIRED.SPLIT_LOADS */ > + INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x42d0, 0xf), /* MEM_UOPS_RETIRED.SPLIT_STORES */ > + INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x81d0, 0xf), /* MEM_UOPS_RETIRED.ALL_LOADS */ > + INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x82d0, 0xf), /* MEM_UOPS_RETIRED.ALL_STORES */ Just wondering, are there all d0 events? Or is this a specific subset? That is, why not use: INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xd0, 0xf), /* MEM_UOPS_RETIRED.* */ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists