lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120928132512.GF29125@suse.de>
Date:	Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:25:12 +0100
From:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To:	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CMA: migrate mlocked page

On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 03:32:45PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Now CMA can't migrate mlocked page so it ends up fail to allocate
> contiguous memory space. It's not good for CMA.
> This patch makes mlocked page be migrated out.
> Of course, it can affect realtime processes but in CMA usecase,
> contiguos memory allocation failing is far worse than access latency
> to an mlcoked page being vairable while CMA is running.
> If someone want to make the system realtime, he shouldn't enable
> CMA because stall happens in random time.
> 
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
> Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
> Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>

Mindlessly petty nit below.

> ---
>  include/linux/mmzone.h |    2 ++
>  mm/compaction.c        |    8 ++++++--
>  mm/internal.h          |    2 +-
>  mm/page_alloc.c        |    2 +-
>  mm/vmscan.c            |    4 ++--
>  5 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> index 10aa549..2c9348a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -218,6 +218,8 @@ struct lruvec {
>  #define ISOLATE_UNMAPPED	((__force isolate_mode_t)0x2)
>  /* Isolate for asynchronous migration */
>  #define ISOLATE_ASYNC_MIGRATE	((__force isolate_mode_t)0x4)
> +/* Isolate unevictable pages */
> +#define ISOLATE_UNEVICTABLE	((__force isolate_mode_t)0x8)
>  
>  /* LRU Isolation modes. */
>  typedef unsigned __bitwise__ isolate_mode_t;
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index 5037399..891637d 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -445,6 +445,7 @@ static bool too_many_isolated(struct zone *zone)
>   * @cc:		Compaction control structure.
>   * @low_pfn:	The first PFN of the range.
>   * @end_pfn:	The one-past-the-last PFN of the range.
> + * @unevictable: true if it allows to isolate unevictable pages
>   *
>   * Isolate all pages that can be migrated from the range specified by
>   * [low_pfn, end_pfn).  Returns zero if there is a fatal signal
> @@ -460,7 +461,7 @@ static bool too_many_isolated(struct zone *zone)
>   */
>  unsigned long
>  isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
> -			   unsigned long low_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> +		unsigned long low_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn, bool unevictable)
>  {
>  	unsigned long last_pageblock_nr = 0, pageblock_nr;
>  	unsigned long nr_scanned = 0, nr_isolated = 0;
> @@ -585,6 +586,9 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
>  		if (!cc->sync)
>  			mode |= ISOLATE_ASYNC_MIGRATE;
>  
> +		if (unevictable)
> +			mode |= ISOLATE_UNEVICTABLE;
> +
>  		lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page, zone);
>  
>  		/* Try isolate the page */
> @@ -790,7 +794,7 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct zone *zone,
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Perform the isolation */
> -	low_pfn = isolate_migratepages_range(zone, cc, low_pfn, end_pfn);
> +	low_pfn = isolate_migratepages_range(zone, cc, low_pfn, end_pfn, false);
>  	if (!low_pfn || cc->contended)
>  		return ISOLATE_ABORT;
>  
> diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
> index d1e84fd..9d5d276 100644
> --- a/mm/internal.h
> +++ b/mm/internal.h
> @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ unsigned long
>  isolate_freepages_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn);
>  unsigned long
>  isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
> -			   unsigned long low_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn);
> +	unsigned long low_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn, bool unevictable);
>  
>  #endif
>  
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 1a69094..296bea9 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -5694,7 +5694,7 @@ static int __alloc_contig_migrate_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
>  		if (list_empty(&cc.migratepages)) {
>  			cc.nr_migratepages = 0;
>  			pfn = isolate_migratepages_range(cc.zone, &cc,
> -							 pfn, end);
> +							 pfn, end, true);
>  			if (!pfn) {
>  				ret = -EINTR;
>  				break;
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index b5e45f4..1df51f4 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1009,8 +1009,8 @@ int __isolate_lru_page(struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode)
>  	if (!PageLRU(page))
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	/* Do not give back unevictable pages for compaction */
> -	if (PageUnevictable(page))
> +	/* Compaction can't handle unevictable pages but CMA can do */
> +	if (PageUnevictable(page) && !(mode & ISOLATE_UNEVICTABLE))
>  		return ret;

"can't" implies that it is technically incapable of it. "should not"
would be better than "cannot". Do not republish the patch for just this
reason :)

Otherwise I think it's ok as migration should correctly handle mlocked
pages and preserve the bits in mlock_migrate_page().

Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ