[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACVXFVPs-TSoep3T_Pn3PgNEKWYSCiRNSnNOD66TcERUQJmmeA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 22:07:22 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: anish singh <anish198519851985@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: fix possible missing of device probe
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
>> I do not mention threads case in one CPU because the context in
>> which device_add runs will always see the driver added into
>
> There you go again. Look at my _much_ better description of the problem
> and you'll notice that device_add has nothing to do with this.
OK, I explain it again:
CPU0 CPU1
driver_register
...
bus_add_driver
driver_attach
device_add(devb)
klist_add_tail(klist_drivers)
When device_add(devb) is run just after completion of driver_attach
and before klist_add_tail(klist_drivers), the 'devb' can't be probed
in device_add because the driver hasn't been added into bus,
and it wasn't be probed in driver_attach because driver_attach didn't
see the device in the bus.
So the 'devb' will be missed to be probed in the bus, won't it?
Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists