[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1349098929.1613.11.camel@leonhard>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 22:42:09 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib tools traceevent: Add back pevent assignment in
__pevent_parse_format()
2012-09-28 (금), 22:20 -0400, Steven Rostedt:
> Even though with the change of commit commit 2b29175 "tools lib traceevent:
> Carve out events format parsing routine", allowed __pevent_parse_format() to
> parse an event without the need of a pevent handler, the event still needs to
> assign the pevent handed to it.
>
> There's no problem with assigning it if the pevent is NULL, as the event->pevent
> would be NULL without the assignment. But function parsing handlers may be
> assigned to the pevent handler to help in parsing the event. If there's no
> pevent then there would not be any function handlers, but if the pevent
> isn't assigned first before parsing the event, it wont honor the function
> handlers that were assigned.
>
> Worse yet, the current code crashes if an event has a function that it tries
> to parse. For example:
>
> # perf record -e scsi:scsi_dispatch_cmd_timeout
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>
> This happens because the scsi_dispatch_cmd_timeout event format has the following:
>
> __print_hex(__get_dynamic_array(cmnd), REC->cmd_len)
>
> which hasn't been defined by the pevent code.
??? We have both of __print_hex() and __get_dynamic_array() handler,
please see process_function. In my case, the offending function was
"scsi_trace_parse_cdb".
Other than that, looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists