[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x49ipatj4oy.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 16:52:13 -0400
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, axboe@...nel.dk, tj@...nel.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] cfq-iosched: Rename "service_tree" to "st"
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> writes:
> At quite a few places we use the keyword "service_tree" and I feel that
> names in CFQ are already very long and they need to be shortened a bit
> where appropriate.
>
> So this patch just renames "service_tree" to "st" at most of the places.
> No functionality change.
NACK.
> - struct cfq_rb_root service_trees[2][3];
> - struct cfq_rb_root service_tree_idle;
> + struct cfq_rb_root sts[2][3];
> + struct cfq_rb_root st_idle;
Honestly, who looks at sts and thinks "service trees?"
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists