[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121001204950.GA11875@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 21:49:51 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arm64: Linux kernel port
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 07:59:52PM +0100, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com> wrote:
> >
> > Please pull the tag below containing the arm64 Linux port. The code
> > lives primarily under arch/arm64/ with a few bits of generic code
> > outside this. Thanks.
>
> Ok, pulled.
Thanks.
> However, looking at the non-arm64 changes, I note:
>
> - the UID16 config option *has* to be fixed.
>
> This is not really about arm64, the ugliness comes from every crazy
> architecture. But we really need to fix this to have something like a
> "HAVE_UID16" config option, and have the architectures that support
> this select that option, so that the UID16 config option can just have
> a "depends on HAVE_UID16".
>
> Please? Anybody?
>
> - same goes for DEBUG_KMEMLEAK and DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE.
>
> - very similar issues for the crazy mess of "#if defined()" in
> kernel/sysctl.c. Can we please just add a SYSCTL_EXCEPTION_TRACE
> config option, and have the architectures that want this just select
> it?
I agree, they don't look nice. I'll post patches to clean them up.
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists