linux-kernel - Re: Re: 3.4.10 i915 [GM45] regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKMK7uEuRN1WerdF1KEDzova4Qe_hY20i3N=HeNVwvRYxf6gsw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 2 Oct 2012 09:17:22 +0200
From:	Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To:	Andreas Sturmlechner <andreas.sturmlechner@...il.com>
Cc:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton.krzesinski@...onical.com>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: 3.4.10 i915 [GM45] regression

On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Andreas Sturmlechner
<andreas.sturmlechner@...il.com> wrote:
>> Andreas, can you please check whether 3.5.x works for you, just to
>> make sure that this particular elephant is only wreaking havoc in 3.4
>> and earlier?
>
> I've been using 3.5 all the time since .0, I never had any trouble there - a few reboots just now with a vanilla 3.5.4 image were
> successful as expected. Meanwhile I have upgraded to 3.6, zero issues as well.

So 3.5 and later really don't seem to have any issue with this patch.
I'm as puzzled as ever. Thanks for testing this again.

Cheers, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/