linux-kernel - Re: Re: 3.4.10 i915 [GM45] regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121004222842.GE3609@kroah.com>
Date:	Thu, 4 Oct 2012 15:28:42 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc:	Andreas Sturmlechner <andreas.sturmlechner@...il.com>,
	Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton.krzesinski@...onical.com>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: 3.4.10 i915 [GM45] regression

On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 09:17:22AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Andreas Sturmlechner
> <andreas.sturmlechner@...il.com> wrote:
> >> Andreas, can you please check whether 3.5.x works for you, just to
> >> make sure that this particular elephant is only wreaking havoc in 3.4
> >> and earlier?
> >
> > I've been using 3.5 all the time since .0, I never had any trouble there - a few reboots just now with a vanilla 3.5.4 image were
> > successful as expected. Meanwhile I have upgraded to 3.6, zero issues as well.
> 
> So 3.5 and later really don't seem to have any issue with this patch.
> I'm as puzzled as ever. Thanks for testing this again.

I forgot to revert this for 3.4, I'll do so in the next 3.4-stable
release after this one, thanks.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/