linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/10] ARM: ux500: Stop calling the UIB init function when using Device Tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121002121533.GA26783@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 2 Oct 2012 13:15:33 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	arnd@...db.de, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] ARM: ux500: Stop calling the UIB init function
 when using Device Tree

On Tue, 02 Oct 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> 
> > As there will be a Device Tree created for the UIBs, there is no
> > need to call the UIB initiation functions. Each device will be
> > detailed and registered from the Device Tree instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> 
> Acked-by, but...
> 
> > -       .init_late      = ux500_init_late,
> > +       .init_late      = NULL,
> 
> Why even define it?

More to show that we're _intentionally_ not using it.

I'm happy to remove if it offends you? :)

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/