linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/10] ARM: ux500: Stop calling the UIB init function when using Device Tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdZ8ZLNi+VTqoP18zsA01QLjD7uSGWJGvP=2rkkqVTs3jw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 2 Oct 2012 14:58:15 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	arnd@...db.de, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] ARM: ux500: Stop calling the UIB init function when
 using Device Tree

On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Oct 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> > As there will be a Device Tree created for the UIBs, there is no
>> > need to call the UIB initiation functions. Each device will be
>> > detailed and registered from the Device Tree instead.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>>
>> Acked-by, but...
>>
>> > -       .init_late      = ux500_init_late,
>> > +       .init_late      = NULL,
>>
>> Why even define it?
>
> More to show that we're _intentionally_ not using it.
>
> I'm happy to remove if it offends you? :)

No, I was just asking. I did ACK it...

Thanks,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/