[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121002132603.GB758@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 09:26:03 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, axboe@...nel.dk, tj@...nel.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] cfq-iosched: Rename "service_tree" to "st"
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 04:52:13PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> writes:
>
> > At quite a few places we use the keyword "service_tree" and I feel that
> > names in CFQ are already very long and they need to be shortened a bit
> > where appropriate.
> >
> > So this patch just renames "service_tree" to "st" at most of the places.
> > No functionality change.
>
> NACK.
>
> > - struct cfq_rb_root service_trees[2][3];
> > - struct cfq_rb_root service_tree_idle;
> > + struct cfq_rb_root sts[2][3];
> > + struct cfq_rb_root st_idle;
>
> Honestly, who looks at sts and thinks "service trees?"
Yes this one is little odd. Ok, I will change it back to "service_tree"
and only use "st" for local variables and in some function names.
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists