linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ubi tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1349248843.2017.108.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 03 Oct 2012 10:20:43 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ubi tree

On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 12:27 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Artem,
> 
> After merging the ubi tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
> 
> ERROR: "ubi_update_fastmap" [drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "ubi_scan_fastmap" [drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "ubi_calc_fm_size" [drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.ko] undefined!

I've added Richard's fastmap work there. I'll look at these failures.

And yes, using the previous ubi tree is a good decision, thanks!

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)