[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5AKf0uL9p-cSd7D5XeB6Q9s5EPHDjAgwfkXGGXVLPreMw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 13:04:33 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, ashish.jangam@...tcummins.com,
dchen@...semi.com, arnd@...db.de, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mfd: da9052-core: Use regmap_irq_get_virq() and fix
the probe
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Mark Brown
<broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 05:34:18PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>
>> +static struct irq_chip da9052_irq_chip = {
>> + .name = "da9052",
>> + .irq_disable = da9052_irq_disable,
>> + .irq_enable = da9052_irq_enable,
>> +};
>
> I don't understand what this irq_chip or the custom domain you're adding
> are for?
I declared da9052_irq_chip because I do the following:
irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &da9052_irq_chip, handle_level_irq);
I am following the arizona-irq approach.
If this is not suitable, can you please point me to some driver that
does not define irq_chip and can still do setup
"irq_set_chip_and_handler()"?
Thanks,
Fabio Estevam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists