[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121003153625.39fd5af7.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 15:36:25 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Alexandre Bounine <alexandre.bounine@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Matt Porter <mporter@...nel.crashing.org>,
Li Yang <leoli@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] rapidio: add destination ID allocation mechanism
On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 15:18:43 -0400
Alexandre Bounine <alexandre.bounine@....com> wrote:
> Replace the single global destination ID counter with per-net allocation
> mechanism to allow independent destID management for each available RapidIO
> network. Using bitmap based mechanism instead of counters allows
> destination ID release and reuse in systems that support hot-swap.
>
>
> ...
>
> +static u16 rio_destid_alloc(struct rio_net *net)
> +{
> + int destid;
> + struct rio_id_table *idtab = &net->destid_table;
> +
> + spin_lock(&idtab->lock);
> + destid = find_next_zero_bit(idtab->table, idtab->max, idtab->next);
> + if (destid >= idtab->max)
> + destid = find_first_zero_bit(idtab->table, idtab->max);
> +
> + if (destid < idtab->max) {
> + idtab->next = destid + 1;
> + if (idtab->next >= idtab->max)
> + idtab->next = 0;
> + set_bit(destid, idtab->table);
> + destid += idtab->start;
> + } else
> + destid = RIO_INVALID_DESTID;
> +
> + spin_unlock(&idtab->lock);
> + return (u16)destid;
> +}
This is round-robin rather than the simpler first-fit, and this reader
doesn't know why. Suggest the addition of a code comment explaining
this decision.
> +/*
> + * rio_destid_reserve - Reserve the specivied destID
> + * net: RIO network
> + * destid: destID to reserve
> + *
> + * Tries to reserve the specified destID.
> + * Returns 0 if successfull.
> + */
> +static int rio_destid_reserve(struct rio_net *net, u16 destid)
> +{
> + int oldbit;
> + struct rio_id_table *idtab = &net->destid_table;
> +
> + destid -= idtab->start;
> + spin_lock(&idtab->lock);
> + oldbit = test_and_set_bit(destid, idtab->table);
> + spin_unlock(&idtab->lock);
> + return oldbit;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * rio_destid_free - free a previously allocated destID
> + * net: RIO network
> + * destid: destID to free
> + *
> + * Makes the specified destID available for use.
> + */
> +static void rio_destid_free(struct rio_net *net, u16 destid)
> +{
> + struct rio_id_table *idtab = &net->destid_table;
> +
> + destid -= idtab->start;
> + spin_lock(&idtab->lock);
> + clear_bit(destid, idtab->table);
> + spin_unlock(&idtab->lock);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * rio_destid_first - return first destID in use
> + * net: RIO network
> + */
> +static u16 rio_destid_first(struct rio_net *net)
> +{
> + int destid;
> + struct rio_id_table *idtab = &net->destid_table;
> +
> + spin_lock(&idtab->lock);
> + destid = find_first_bit(idtab->table, idtab->max);
> + if (destid >= idtab->max)
> + destid = RIO_INVALID_DESTID;
> + else
> + destid += idtab->start;
> + spin_unlock(&idtab->lock);
> + return (u16)destid;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * rio_destid_next - return next destID in use
> + * net: RIO network
> + * from: destination ID from which search shall continue
> + */
All these code comments look like kerneldoc, but they aren't. kerneldoc
uses /** and identifiers have a leading `@'. And that's OK - one
doesn't *have* to use kerneldoc. But a lot of
drivers/rapidio/rio-scan.c is already using kerneldoc so the
inconsistency is odd.
>
> ...
>
> -static struct rio_net __devinit *rio_alloc_net(struct rio_mport *port)
> +static struct rio_net __devinit *rio_alloc_net(struct rio_mport *port,
> + int do_enum, u16 start)
> {
> struct rio_net *net;
>
> net = kzalloc(sizeof(struct rio_net), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (net && do_enum) {
> + net->destid_table.table = kzalloc(
> + BITS_TO_LONGS(RIO_MAX_ROUTE_ENTRIES(port->sys_size)) *
> + sizeof(long),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
kcalloc() would be idiomatic here.
> + if (net->destid_table.table == NULL) {
> + pr_err("RIO: failed to allocate destID table\n");
> + kfree(net);
> + net = NULL;
> + } else {
> + net->destid_table.start = start;
> + net->destid_table.next = 0;
> + net->destid_table.max =
> + RIO_MAX_ROUTE_ENTRIES(port->sys_size);
> + spin_lock_init(&net->destid_table.lock);
> + }
> + }
> +
>
> ...
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists