[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121004074442.180d8f01@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 07:44:42 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...il.com>
Cc: mlindner@...vell.com, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/20] drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/skge.c: fix error
return code
On Thu, 4 Oct 2012 11:05:55 +0200
Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for looking into these kind of problems. The contents
> > of the patch are correct, but the automated commit message is useless.
> > You shouldn't just blindly say what the automated
> > script was looking for, you should describe what the bug is so that evaluators
> > can decide what the impact is and if it should be backported to stable
> > and vendor kernels.
> >
> > Please resubmit the patchs with a reasonable analysis in the commit message.
> > Something like:
> >
> > There is a bug in skge driver. If alloc_etherdev() fails, then
> > skge_devinit() will return NULL, and the skge_probe function incorrectly
> > returns success 0. It should return -ENOMEM instead.
> >
> >
>
> Stephen, I do not want to include function names on the commit
> message. What do you think about this updated message, is it
> acceptable?
>
No still to generic, it needs to be written by a human examining
the file and understanding what the cause and effect of the bug
is.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists