[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <506DDA31.9010503@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 11:49:21 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
CC: arm@...nel.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: arm-soc maintainer entry
On 10/04/12 09:55, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:41 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>> Is the arm@...nel.org alias going to be added into the MAINTAINERS file?
>> Should anybody be sending mails to this address?
>>
>> It seems I asked this over a year ago and the response was positive but
>> nothing ever happened[1]. Maybe something like below? I only ask because
>> get_maintainer.pl isn't picking up this email.
> I've been holding off re-proposing this, mostly because life is easier
> for us if we don't get arm@...nel.org cc:d on every single patch by
> people who run get_maintainers.pl -- it's the equivalent of getting
> linux-arm-kernel cc:d to your inbox. It's better signal-to-noise ratio
> if it's mostly platform maintainers that email us on that address with
> pull requests or patches they want applied.
>
> But yeah, it also means that the maintainer structure is undocumented.
> I'm open for suggestions.
>
Thanks for clarifying. Maybe we can put in the git tree and no email
address? That at least documents some structure.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists