[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121005154733.GA1738@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 08:47:33 -0700
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf trace: Setup pager before running
Em Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 02:02:12PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
>
> Since perf trace emits lots of messages on terminal, it'd better using
> a pager.
Humm, I'm used to the strace behaviour, i.e. free flow of events, unsure
if using the pager in this specific case is right, perhaps it should be
optional.
In the TUI case, when we get to implement it there, I think that we can
go to/from pager mode, expanding callchains for pagefaults and other
events, for instance.
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists