linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fix bogus "callbacks suppressed" messages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121005154847.GB246@x4>
Date:	Fri, 5 Oct 2012 17:48:47 +0200
From:	Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix bogus "callbacks suppressed" messages

On 2012.10.05 at 17:43 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 08:37:06AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > So WARN_RATELIMIT was never working properly? If so, how far back does
> > it go in kernel releases that this should be fixed?
> 
> Since b3eec79b0776e which added it in May 2011. But the only one othe r
> user is net/core/filter.c.

But it doesn't matter, because the WARN_RATELIMIT in net/core/filter.c
is guarded by a switch statement and uses WARN_RATELIMIT(1,...). So it
could never trigger the bug.

-- 
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/