[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121005160336.GH24764@aftab.osrc.amd.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 18:03:36 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
To: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix bogus "callbacks suppressed" messages
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 05:48:47PM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2012.10.05 at 17:43 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 08:37:06AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > So WARN_RATELIMIT was never working properly? If so, how far back does
> > > it go in kernel releases that this should be fixed?
> >
> > Since b3eec79b0776e which added it in May 2011. But the only one othe r
> > user is net/core/filter.c.
>
> But it doesn't matter, because the WARN_RATELIMIT in net/core/filter.c
> is guarded by a switch statement and uses WARN_RATELIMIT(1,...). So it
> could never trigger the bug.
Yes, but you should say "it covers the bug with a brown paper bag
because the condition is always true."
:-)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists