linux-kernel - RE: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] TPM: Issue TPM_STARTUP at driver load if the TPM has not been started

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <74A44E99E3274B4CB570415926B37D440EC19C@MUCSE501.eu.infineon.com>
Date:	Mon, 8 Oct 2012 07:09:33 +0000
From:	<Peter.Huewe@...ineon.com>
To:	<key@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: RE: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] TPM: Issue TPM_STARTUP at driver load if
 the TPM has not been started

Hi Kent,
>  Peter, you mentioned you have some embedded setups, would you be able
> to test?

I could probably test it on the beagleboard c4 with our Infineon SLB9635 TT1.2 I2C TPM, 
but I'm currently not sure if I have the suspend/resume thing currently running correctly.

Apart from that I also have some 'ancient' x86 systems without TPM bios integration here 
(so the BIOS doesn't even know anything about a tpm), there I could test our LPC based tpms (SLB9635 / SLB9655).

Unfortunately it'll take some time, due to other priorities.
Please tell me when the patch is ready for testing.

Thanks,
Peter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/