linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALLzPKZaayux=ocJucr=rrzcDx0DxRxv0xLpkt4ZPVU7pbw0kg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 9 Oct 2012 13:55:30 +0300
From:	"Kasatkin, Dmitry" <dmitry.kasatkin@...el.com>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au,
	pjones@...hat.com, jwboyer@...hat.com,
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...ux-nfs.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing

On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:
> David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> writes:
>
>> Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:
>>
>>> Right.  I think we need to use different names for generated vs supplied
>>> files
>>
>> The problem with supplied files is people who do allyesconfig, allmodconfig
>> and randconfig just to test things finding that their builds break.  The
>> kernel build magic is not really set up to handle external files like this.  I
>> suppose make logic can be used to conditionally include stuff that might not
>> exist.
>>
>>> BTW, you missed a Signed-off-by: on your "MODSIGN: Use the same digest
>>> for the autogen key sig as for the module sig" patch.  Please update.
>>
>> Done.
>>
>> I've also added a patch to convert the system clock to a struct tm and to
>> produce a struct tm within the ASN.1 decode and then compare those rather than
>> time_t values as a way to deal with the validity time overflow problem.  We
>> may have to be able to handle certificates that we haven't generated that
>> stretch beyond 2038 (I wonder if we might find such in the UEFI key database
>> for example.
>
> OK, cherry-picked to replace my hack.
>
> It's in linux-next, and I will push in the next two days.
>


http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/rusty/linux.git;a=commit;h=a15e196c5543d1d2d7f0cd70e62351aeb1f8b871

It breaks bisect..

  CC      kernel/module_signing.o
kernel/module_signing.c: In function ‘mod_verify_sig’:
kernel/module_signing.c:21:10: error: ‘ENOKEY’ undeclared (first use
in this function)
kernel/module_signing.c:21:10: note: each undeclared identifier is
reported only once for each function it appears in
kernel/module_signing.c:22:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void
function [-Wreturn-type]
make[1]: *** [kernel/module_signing.o] Error 1
make: *** [kernel] Error 2
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....

> Thanks,
> Rusty.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/