lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1349951069.2425.44.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:24:29 +0100
From:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To:	James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>
Cc:	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] scsi: make struct scsi_varlen_cdb_hdr packed

On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 10:15 +0100, James Hogan wrote:
> The struct scsi_varlen_cdb_hdr is expected to be exactly 10 bytes when
> used in struct osd_cdb_head, but it isn't marked as packed. Some
> architectures will round the struct size up which triggers BUILD_BUG_ON
> compile errors in osd_initiator.c when the outer structs are unexpected
> sizes. This is fixed by marking struct scsi_varlen_cdb_hdr as __packed.

What actual problem have you encountered? The structure is {u8[8], u16}
which is naturally packed on every architecture I know about.  I've even
built osd_initiator without problem on parisc, which has some of the
most rigid alignment rules I've seen.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ