[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121016042119.GP2616@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 05:21:19 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 02:50:29PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Al,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> arch/sparc/kernel/head_64.o: In function `sys64_execve':
> (.text+0x1f58): relocation truncated to fit: R_SPARC_WDISP19 against symbol `sys_execve' defined in .text section in fs/built-in.o
> arch/sparc/kernel/head_64.o: In function `sys32_execve':
> (.text+0x1f64): relocation truncated to fit: R_SPARC_WDISP19 against symbol `compat_sys_execve' defined in .text section in fs/built-in.o
>
> Probably caused by commit 3223f8aab885 ("sparc64: convert to generic
> execve") and following from the signal tree.
>
> I have added this patch you suggested on IRC:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 14:43:51 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] sparc: fixup for conversion to generic execve
>
> Fixes these errors:
>
> arch/sparc/kernel/head_64.o: In function `sys64_execve':
> (.text+0x1f58): relocation truncated to fit: R_SPARC_WDISP19 against symbol `sys_execve' defined in .text section in fs/built-in.o
> arch/sparc/kernel/head_64.o: In function `sys32_execve':
> (.text+0x1f64): relocation truncated to fit: R_SPARC_WDISP19 against symbol `compat_sys_execve' defined in .text section in fs/built-in.o
>
> Dictated-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> ---
> arch/sparc/kernel/syscalls.S | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/syscalls.S b/arch/sparc/kernel/syscalls.S
> index 4bae096..f667cdf 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/kernel/syscalls.S
> +++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/syscalls.S
> @@ -2,15 +2,19 @@
> * environment settings are the same as the calling processes.
> */
> sys64_execve:
> - ba,pt %xcc,sys_execve
> - flushw
> + flushw
> + mov %o7, %l5
> + call sys_execve
> + mov %l5, %o7
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> sunos_execv:
> mov %g0, %o2
> sys32_execve:
> - ba,pt %xcc,compat_sys_execve
> - flushw
> + flushw
> + mov %o7, %l5
> + call compat_sys_execve
> + mov %l5, %o7
> #endif
BTW, that's really quick and dirty; I'm not at all sure we need that
flushw there, which could make things much simpler. Namely, kill
sys64_execve completely, making it equivalent to sys_execve(), do the
same to sys32_execve() (== compat_sys_execve()) and as for sunos_execv(),
I'd simply put it into sys_sparc32.c as
SYSCALL_DEFINE2(sunos_execv,
char __user *, filename,
const char __user *const __user *, argv)
{
return compat_sys_execve(filename, argv, NULL);
}
We definitely want flushw in fork and friends, but I'm not sure what we
need it for in execve(2)...
Anyway, the brute-force variant works. I had been lucky to stay within the
ba,pt target limit on the config I used (very heavily modular, so not much
code in vmlinux in the first place, let alone before fs/exec.o), so I'd missed
the problem until now. I've booted that with fatter config that would blow the
previous variant at link time and it works.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists