[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121016042713.GA21841@localhost>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:27:13 +0800
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: fix the wrong #ifdef for acpi_no_s4_hw_signature
The title could be made more descriptive:
ACPI: move acpi_no_s4_hw_signature() declaration into #ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:05:03PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> acpi_no_s4_hw_signature is defined in #ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION block,
> but the current code put the declare in #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP block.
And it's better to always include the original build error/warning
messages when fixing build problems.
Otherwise looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> include/linux/acpi.h | 5 ++++-
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index 90be989..a468429 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -257,8 +257,11 @@ int acpi_check_region(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t n,
>
> int acpi_resources_are_enforced(void);
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION
> void __init acpi_no_s4_hw_signature(void);
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> void __init acpi_old_suspend_ordering(void);
> void __init acpi_nvs_nosave(void);
> #endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
> --
> 1.7.7.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists