[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121016083927.GG29125@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 09:39:27 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Richard Davies <richard@...chsys.com>,
Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
QEMU-devel <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arm Kernel Mailing List
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH] mm: compaction: Correct the nr_strict_isolated check for CMA
Thierry reported that the "iron out" patch for isolate_freepages_block()
had problems due to the strict check being too strict with "mm: compaction:
Iron out isolate_freepages_block() and isolate_freepages_range() -fix1".
It's possible that more pages than necessary are isolated but the check
still fails and I missed that this fix was not picked up before RC1. This
same problem has been identified in 3.7-RC1 by Tony Prisk and should be
addressed by the following patch.
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Tested-by: Tony Prisk <linux@...sktech.co.nz>
---
mm/compaction.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index 2c4ce17..9eef558 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ static unsigned long isolate_freepages_block(struct compact_control *cc,
* pages requested were isolated. If there were any failures, 0 is
* returned and CMA will fail.
*/
- if (strict && nr_strict_required != total_isolated)
+ if (strict && nr_strict_required > total_isolated)
total_isolated = 0;
if (locked)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists