linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 RESEND] gpio: samsung: use pr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 16 Oct 2012 19:32:55 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
Cc:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ryan Mallon <rmallon@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 RESEND] gpio: samsung: use pr_* instead of printk

On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com> wrote:

>  int samsung_gpio_setpull_updown(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip,
>                                 unsigned int off, samsung_gpio_pull_t pull)
>  {
> @@ -599,7 +593,7 @@ static int samsung_gpiolib_4bit_input(struct gpio_chip *chip,
>         con &= ~(0xf << con_4bit_shift(offset));
>         __raw_writel(con, base + GPIOCON_OFF);
>
> -       gpio_dbg("%s: %p: CON now %08lx\n", __func__, base, con);
> +       pr_debug("%s: %p: CON now %08lx\n", __func__, base, con);

Does your struct gpio_chip provide a valid dev pointer so you can use:

dev_dbg(chip->dev, "%s: %p: CON now %08lx\n", __func__, base, con);

In that case use the dev_* print macros everywhere instead.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/