[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHGf_=pr1AYeWZhaC2MKN-XjiWB7=hs92V0sH-zVw3i00X-e=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 22:34:53 -0400
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
bhutchings@...arflare.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: mpol_to_str revisited.
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:
> Last month I sent in 80de7c3138ee9fd86a98696fd2cf7ad89b995d0a to remove
> a user triggerable BUG in mempolicy.
>
> Ben Hutchings pointed out to me that my change introduced a potential leak
> of stack contents to userspace, because none of the callers check the return value.
>
> This patch adds the missing return checking, and also clears the buffer beforehand.
I don't think 80de7c3138ee9fd86a98696fd2cf7ad89b995d0a is right fix. we should
close a race (or kill remain ref count leak) if we still have.
Because of, this patch makes unstable /proc output and might lead to
userland confusing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists