[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1210152055150.5400@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 20:58:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
cc: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
bhutchings@...arflare.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: mpol_to_str revisited.
On Mon, 15 Oct 2012, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> I don't think 80de7c3138ee9fd86a98696fd2cf7ad89b995d0a is right fix.
It's certainly not a complete fix, but I think it's a much better result
of the race, i.e. we don't panic anymore, we simply fail the read()
instead.
> we should
> close a race (or kill remain ref count leak) if we still have.
As I mentioned earlier in the thread, the read() is done here on a task
while only a reference to the task_struct is taken and we do not hold
task_lock() which is required for task->mempolicy. Once that is fixed,
mpol_to_str() should never be called for !task->mempolicy so it will never
need to return -EINVAL in such a condition.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists