linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!).

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121017174317.GA25443@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date:	Wed, 17 Oct 2012 13:43:17 -0400
From:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To:	Ben Guthro <ben@...hro.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
	lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com,
	x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!).

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 01:46:09PM -0400, Ben Guthro wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> <konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
> [...]
> 
> > The end result is this is a nice set of patches where there is only
> > _one_ change in the x86 code (and it is just more of dealing with
> > error case) - and the rest are all done in Xen side.
> 
> I'm sorry to report that this series doesn't seem to work in my setup
> against xen-unstable.
> 
> To verify that it was, in fact this patch series, and not another Xen
> regression - I swapped out the kernel with this patch series, with an
> identical one, replacing only this series with your acpi-s3.v9 branch
> - and everything worked fine.

Thanks for testing it!

I had tested it with Xen 4.1.3, which could be doing something different.
Will see what is up.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/