[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOvdn6Uubr8J0a5+nhDKrtMYebKkBTX6+-0v0J1BGMnU-ZkVRA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 14:00:29 -0400
From: Ben Guthro <ben@...hro.net>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!).
I'm not sure it matters, but I'm testing against a changeset about a week old:
http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commit;h=1c4a5b37b55c56e49135e65728137f54288d1fe6
Plus patches specific to XenClient Enterprise.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
<konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 01:46:09PM -0400, Ben Guthro wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
>> <konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> > The end result is this is a nice set of patches where there is only
>> > _one_ change in the x86 code (and it is just more of dealing with
>> > error case) - and the rest are all done in Xen side.
>>
>> I'm sorry to report that this series doesn't seem to work in my setup
>> against xen-unstable.
>>
>> To verify that it was, in fact this patch series, and not another Xen
>> regression - I swapped out the kernel with this patch series, with an
>> identical one, replacing only this series with your acpi-s3.v9 branch
>> - and everything worked fine.
>
> Thanks for testing it!
>
> I had tested it with Xen 4.1.3, which could be doing something different.
> Will see what is up.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists