linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH 4/4] net: smc91x: use io{read,write}*_rep accessors instead of string functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50810E8C.5010806@imgtec.com>
Date:	Fri, 19 Oct 2012 09:25:48 +0100
From:	James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>
To:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>,
	Ben Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 4/4] net: smc91x: use io{read,write}*_rep accessors
 instead of string functions

On 17/10/12 16:45, Will Deacon wrote:
> The {read,write}s{b,w,l} operations are not defined by all architectures
> and are being removed from the asm-generic/io.h interface.
> 
> This patch replaces the usage of these string functions in the default
> SMC accessors with io{read,write}{8,16,32}_rep calls instead, which are
> defined for all architectures.

Hi,

Should this patch (and the mmc one) precede patch 1?

Also there appear to be some other places that it's used (e.g.
smsc911x.c and smc911x.h). I guess these should be fixed up first too?

Cheers
James

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/