[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121019092714.GC4582@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 10:27:14 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Ben Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 4/4] net: smc91x: use io{read,write}*_rep
accessors instead of string functions
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 09:25:48AM +0100, James Hogan wrote:
> On 17/10/12 16:45, Will Deacon wrote:
> > The {read,write}s{b,w,l} operations are not defined by all architectures
> > and are being removed from the asm-generic/io.h interface.
> >
> > This patch replaces the usage of these string functions in the default
> > SMC accessors with io{read,write}{8,16,32}_rep calls instead, which are
> > defined for all architectures.
>
> Hi,
>
> Should this patch (and the mmc one) precede patch 1?
Yup, I can reorder that easily enough.
> Also there appear to be some other places that it's used (e.g.
> smsc911x.c and smc911x.h). I guess these should be fixed up first too?
I could have a look if you like, but I'm wary of changing the I/O accessors
in anything but a mechanical fashion given that I can't test any of my
changes.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists