[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121019135454.GJ31863@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 09:54:54 -0400
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
kosaki.motohiro@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Simplify for_each_populated_zone()
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 04:25:47PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> Move the check for populated_zone() to the control statement of the
> 'for' loop and get rid of the odd looking if/else block.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> include/linux/mmzone.h | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> index 50aaca8..5bdf02e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -913,11 +913,8 @@ extern struct zone *next_zone(struct zone *zone);
>
> #define for_each_populated_zone(zone) \
> for (zone = (first_online_pgdat())->node_zones; \
> - zone; \
> - zone = next_zone(zone)) \
> - if (!populated_zone(zone)) \
> - ; /* do nothing */ \
> - else
> + zone && populated_zone(zone); \
> + zone = next_zone(zone))
I don't think we want to /abort/ the loop when encountering an
unpopulated zone.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists