[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5081630B.2000004@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 19:56:19 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
kosaki.motohiro@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Simplify for_each_populated_zone()
On 10/19/2012 07:24 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 04:25:47PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>> Move the check for populated_zone() to the control statement of the
>> 'for' loop and get rid of the odd looking if/else block.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>
>> include/linux/mmzone.h | 7 ++-----
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
>> index 50aaca8..5bdf02e 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
>> @@ -913,11 +913,8 @@ extern struct zone *next_zone(struct zone *zone);
>>
>> #define for_each_populated_zone(zone) \
>> for (zone = (first_online_pgdat())->node_zones; \
>> - zone; \
>> - zone = next_zone(zone)) \
>> - if (!populated_zone(zone)) \
>> - ; /* do nothing */ \
>> - else
>> + zone && populated_zone(zone); \
>> + zone = next_zone(zone))
>
> I don't think we want to /abort/ the loop when encountering an
> unpopulated zone.
>
Oops! I totally missed that.. thanks for catching it! Please ignore
the patch.
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists