[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50815EA5.5080502@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 10:07:33 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC: mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
aarcange@...hat.com, Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rename NUMA fault handling functions
On 10/19/2012 07:41 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 17:20 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
>> Having the function name indicate what the function is used
>> for makes the code a little easier to read. Furthermore,
>> the fault handling code largely consists of do_...._page
>> functions.
>
> I don't much care either way, but I was thinking walken might want to
> use something similar to do WSS estimation, in which case the NUMA name
> is just as wrong.
That's a good point. I had not considered other uses of the
same code.
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists