lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:35:56 +0200
From:	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
To:	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
CC:	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix vcpu->mmio_fragments overflow

On 2012-10-22 13:23, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 07:09:38PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> On 10/22/2012 05:16 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 03:37:32PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>>> After commit b3356bf0dbb349 (KVM: emulator: optimize "rep ins" handling),
>>>> the pieces of io data can be collected and write them to the guest memory
>>>> or MMIO together.
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately, kvm splits the mmio access into 8 bytes and store them to
>>>> vcpu->mmio_fragments. If the guest uses "rep ins" to move large data, it
>>>> will cause vcpu->mmio_fragments overflow
>>>>
>>>> The bug can be exposed by isapc (-M isapc):
>>>>
>>>> [23154.818733] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
>>>> [ ......]
>>>> [23154.858083] Call Trace:
>>>> [23154.859874]  [<ffffffffa04f0e17>] kvm_get_cr8+0x1d/0x28 [kvm]
>>>> [23154.861677]  [<ffffffffa04fa6d4>] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0xcda/0xe45 [kvm]
>>>> [23154.863604]  [<ffffffffa04f5a1a>] ? kvm_arch_vcpu_load+0x17b/0x180 [kvm]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Actually, we can use one mmio_fragment to store a large mmio access for the
>>>> mmio access is always continuous then split it when we pass the mmio-exit-info
>>>> to userspace. After that, we only need two entries to store mmio info for
>>>> the cross-mmio pages access
>>>>
>>> I wonder can we put the data into coalesced mmio buffer instead of
>>
>> If we put all mmio data into coalesced buffer, we should:
>> - ensure the userspace program uses KVM_REGISTER_COALESCED_MMIO to register
>>   all mmio regions.
>>
> It appears to not be so.
> Userspace calls kvm_flush_coalesced_mmio_buffer() after returning from
> KVM_RUN which looks like this:

Nope, no longer, only on accesses to devices that actually use such
regions (and there are only two ATM). The current design of a global
coalesced mmio ring is horrible /wrt latency.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ