[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121023225919.GB3179@localhost>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 23:59:19 +0100
From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 002/193] checkpatch: warn about using CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 01:01:15PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> This config item has not carried much meaning for a while now and is
> almost always enabled by default. As agreed during the Linux kernel
> summit, it is being removed. This will discourage future addition of
> CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL while it is being phased out.
>
> Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> ---
> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 21a9f5d..37dc932 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -1757,6 +1757,13 @@ sub process {
> #print "is_start<$is_start> is_end<$is_end> length<$length>\n";
> }
>
> +# Discourage the addition of CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL in Kconfig.
> + if ($realfile =~ /Kconfig/ &&
> + $line =~ /.\s*depends on\s+.*\bEXPERIMENTAL\b/) {
> + WARN("CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL",
> + "Use of CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL is deprecated.\n");
> + }
> +
Seem reasonable. Should you suggest how they can mark things
experimental? I assume (EXPERIMENTAL) in the title is now the right
way?
> if (($realfile =~ /Makefile.*/ || $realfile =~ /Kbuild.*/) &&
> ($line =~ /\+(EXTRA_[A-Z]+FLAGS).*/)) {
> my $flag = $1;
-apw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists